Unless you’re well versed in Jewish history and Judaism, most people who hear the term Pharisee have the knee-jerk reaction to associate that label with “ hypocrite”. If that is the case for you, dear reader, I'll bet your notion of a Pharisee is from the New Testament. That definition is not compatible with the Jewish history version of their lives and legacy. New Testament doctrine demonized them because they refused to abandon the eternal covenant (testament) of Torah to worship a Hellenized man/god and assimilate into the Roman empire.
Their depiction in
the New Testament is hardly flattering to say the least. I doubt that my
information regarding the Pharisees will be taken seriously by Christians for
whom their New Testament is believed to be infallible. The Christian Bible
presents Jesus as having a great conflict with the Pharisees. I cannot assume
that Jesus had such a problem with the Pharisees, especially since so many of
this most popular "quotes" are the precise teachings of the Pharisees
who came before him!
I think that it was
the writers of the New Testament who had the problems with the Pharisees and
their strict adherence to Torah’s commands to not add new deities and their
refusal to assimilate into the Roman Empire.
The Pharisees were also a political threat to the Romans because they
promoted equality and literacy for all classes.
The Pharisees were
the members of the sect of Judaism that promoted education and literacy for all
classes, not just the wealthy or elite that were literate across the Roman
Empire. They believed that Torah should
be able to be read and understood by all people. The Pharisees also accepted
converts as fully Jewish and some other sects did not. Ironically, the one sect so often mentioned as being one
that Jesus perhaps had received training from, the Essenes, did not accept
converts. The Pharisees were self-named
because they wanted to keep Torah *separate* from pagan, foreign influence
(Hellenized and Roman man/gods).
The
name Pharisee comes from the Hebrew word perushim, the plural of פָּרוּשׁ the Hebrew word parush, meaning set apart or
separate. They arose as a separate group
of Jews during the Greek occupation; a time when the Greek rulers were working
to assimilate the Jewish people by mixing their deities with Judaism. For some,
their efforts worked. There were quite a few Hellenized Jews, so impressed with
Greek philosophy and literature that they believed it superior to the ways of
the conquered Israel. Greek philosophy
still even managed to influence Judaism despite the Pharisees.
The legacy of the
Pharisees writings and the Jewish history of their lives do not indicate they
were hypocritical elitists the New Testament depicts, but Jews dedicated to
keeping the covenant of Israel intact without corruption from idolatry. The
Pharisees of the New Testament are depicted as people for whom observance of
rote custom and ritual were all important. They were viewed as going through the physical
motions and outward observances without emphasizing the ethics and justice
underlying the reason for the customs or conveying the deep spiritual meanings
or connection. The New Testament depicts them as being spiritually devoid.
It is in fact that
Judaism the Pharisees sought to protect centers on the Torah's precepts that
teach that each individual rich or poor, Jew or Gentile, connects to God
directly without intermediary in a very real, living relationship. It is the Pharisees that taught that how we live
toward one another and care for the world around us is a reflection of our
connection to our faith. The Pharisees did not demonize other nations because
they did not believe the same as they do, but they would speak out just as the
Jews of today are obligated to do, the modern day actual Pharisees speak out
when we are told that we must accept AS JEWISH, beliefs and practices that are
directly forbidden by the eternal covenant of Israel.
Some Christian
missionaries preach the libelous fallacy that the Pharisees and later the
Rabbis who came from them corrupted Torah by adding to it.
It was not Pharisees who sought to either add to or take
away from law. They rejected any and all attempts from any who would try to do
such a thing. It is because they REFUSED to add and take away from the law of
Torah that they were hated by first the
Hellenists and Romans, and then the Christians whose concepts of Jesus as an
incarnate manifestation of the Divine and of human sacrifice to atone for sin
are also forbidden by the Torah to separate the Jew from the eternal covenant.
The Sadducees were
the elitists and among whom were the greatest number of collaborators with Rome
and whose followers included many of the most Hellenized Jews. The Pharisees
were the group that included the common people and the convert. The Pharisees
did not have the attitude of being separate from other Jews adherent to the
covenant, or from the common people, but to be separate from FOREIGN
(Hellenizing) influences.
The most egregiously mistaken notion promoted about the
Pharisees and their purpose for SEPARATION is that they were elitist who held
themselves above others, including other Jews!. The Pharisees taught that Torah put forth that
God was not a distant deity that only spoke to emperors and kings or became one
Himself ..but taught that our Creator is a personal deity that ALL can connect
with directly. The very identity of the covenant nation was established when
every man woman and child who left Egypt had a personal divine revelation at
Sinai. “You have been shown in order to
know that God, He is the Supreme Being. There is none besides Him. From heaven
he let you hear His voice in order to teach you, and on earth He showed you His
great fire, and you heard His words amid the fire.” (Deut. 4:32-36) That is
just one of several passages in Torah that refer to this collective and
personal Divine revelatory experience.
The Pharisees were
demonized in the New Testament by the new religious sect that was created to
try to replace Judaism. What do groups that
try to justify replacement of another tend to do to the group they're trying to
replace? They blame every ill of the world on the other and assign to them
(projections) undesirable attributes that they themselves possess or that they
know can evoke fear and loathing so that the demonized group will be viewed
with disdain and their words not taken seriously.
Hellenized Jews and
Romans believed the philosophy and wisdom of the Greeks could and should be
combined with Torah. The Pharisees ..then and today.. reject this as it is
forbidden to alter the covenant and its purpose.
"The conflict
between the high priesthood and the people led to the split between the
Sadducees and the Pharisees. The elitist Sadducees (who generally controlled
the high priesthood) were supported by the Hasmonean royal family and later by
the Romans."
"The Pharisees.
These were mainstream Jews who wanted nothing to do with the Romans, but they
were pragmatic. They wanted Judaism to survive and short of giving up their
religious principles were willing to make the best of the Roman domination.
They disapproved of the other Jewish factions - those that tried to curry favor
with the Romans and those that advocated open rebellion. " < this from
http://www.aish.com/jl/h/cc/48943421.html
"They said of Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakai that no man ever greeted him first, even idol worshippers in the market" [i.e., Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakai was the first to greet every person, even idol worshippers](Berachot 17). ( This is the FIRST Pharisee to be given the title Rabbi)
"[it is proper to] support the idol worshippers during the sabbatical year …. and to inquire after their welfare [commentators: even on the days of the holidays of their idols, even if they do not keep the seven Noahide commandments] because of the ways of peace." (Shevi'it4,3)
'We support poor Gentiles with the poor people of Israel, and we visit sick Gentiles as well as the sick of Israel and we bury the dead of the Gentiles as well as the dead of Israel, because of the ways of peace." (Gitin 61a)
Paul is often brought up as an example of a Pharisee. Let's just see how that holds up to scrutiny.
**No Jewish writings of the 1st or 2nd century so much as mention a renegade student of Gamaliel who had a faith altering vision. No mention of a star pupil of Gamaliel who became a heretic and urged his followers to disregard Torah's laws of diet and Sabbath observance. No mention of a former student who pronounced the Law and circumcision obsolete. Surely such a renegade could not have completely escaped the attention of the scribes? No writings attributed to Gamaliel or his later students refer to such a man.**(paraphrasing from an article I read by Kenneth Humphries)
A claim that such a thing was removed or hidden is unlikely since from the Torah onward, no Jewish writings have evaded the wrongdoers or those who stray or violate Torah as the Tanakh so clearly reveals.
An more unbiased view based on the evidence would more likely indicate that NT claim was a latter insertion to support Paul’s self proclaimed status.
The writings of Paul don't support that he was a master pupil of Gamaliel. Paul clearly had difficulty with the Hebrew language: all his scriptural references are taken from the Greek translation of Jewish scripture, the Septuagint. The only portion of what is now commonly called the Septuagint translated by “the 70” Jewish scribes was the Torah, the Prophets and Writing were translated over the course of several hundred years by unknown translators. The evidence of Paul's own writings reveal he was a Hellenized, apostate Jew.
"Nothing in his letters suggests that Paul had any official standing in his treatment of Christians ... Hence, in opposition to what Luke says, he could not have used arrest, torture or imprisonment as a means of forcing Christians to recognize that they had been misled." – Murphy O'Connor, Paul, His History, p19
The writings of the Pharisees that were handed down over the
generations to us today reveal lives that are collectively the opposite of the
nefarious depictions of them in the NT replacement theology.
The history of the
Pharisees is the living legacy of the eternal Torah that they preserved by
refusing to assimilate idolatrous concepts into Jewish practices.
Unfortunately, for
millions of people who believe their New Testament to be inerrant, its
fallacious demonization and depiction is also believed to be inerrant, no
matter what evidence may exist to the contrary. The authors of the New
Testament libeled the Pharisees in to discredit their rejection of introduction
of Hellenized and Romanized god/man concepts that God forbids in the Torah.
I thank God that not
all Christians have focused on the hundreds of demonizing passages in the New
Testament and actually focus on the more Jewish (and Pharisee taught Hillel
school of thought) teachings regarding teshuva. An example of that would be the
Sermon on the Mount including the portion they call the Lord's prayer.
Are there people who
fit the false New Testament depiction of the Pharisees today?
Examine the Hebrew
Christian evangelicals that claim Jewish identity and who give all outward
physical appearance of strict adherence to Torah. They’ll wear kippot and
tallit and keep kashrut and other observances and claim to be "Torah
observant" Messianic Jews, while forcing foreign and forbidden beliefs and
contradictory meanings to the rituals and laws of Torah to violate core
precepts of faith of Judaism. That fits the New Testament definition of
Pharisee precisely to give lip service to observance while living in complete
contradiction to the ethical precepts and faith of Judaism.
Those are people who claim to be righteous and claim to
honor the customs and holidays of Judaism, yet in reality have only outward and
superficial posturing appearance as Jews and go through altered forms of Jewish
rituals without any spiritual connection to the Creator who commanded them when
they do them in the name of a false incarnate god and rely upon human sacrifice
instead of the Torah’s path for repentance.
It is utmost hypocrisy
to claim Torah observance if your *observance* or acting out of a rituals is
done to honor a contradictory belief to the precepts and ethics that the
rituals and customs were commanded in Torah to honor for eternity, or even
those that later arose through practice in Diaspora lands to honor Torah and
God exclusively.
Imposing Jesus into
any Jewish custom or Torah commanded holy observance is the antithesis of Torah
observance, thus they are complete hypocrites and fit that common vernacular
definition of "Pharisee" in their own religions usage.
http://www.aish.com/literacy/jewishhistory/Crash_Course_in_Jewish_History_Part_28_-_Greek_Persecution.asp
A good place to get
background on Pharisees and Sadducees.
http://www.jewfaq.org/movement.htm <
another EXCELLENT page to help you
Judaism survived and
Jews exist today primarily because the Pharisees refused to abandon Torah and
dishonor God’s commands for the eternal covenant people.
A quote from the
jewfaq site above:
"The Pharisaic
school of thought is the only one that survived the destruction of the Temple.
The Zealots were killed off during the war with Rome. The Sadducees could not
survive without the Temple, which was the center of their religion. The
Essenes, who were never very numerous, were apparently killed off by the Romans
(they were easily recognizable in their isolated communities).
For many centuries
after the destruction of the Temple, there was no large-scale, organized
difference of opinion within Judaism. Judaism was Judaism, and it was basically
the same as what we now know as Orthodox Judaism. There were some differences
in practices and customs between the Ashkenazic Jews of Eastern Europe and the
Sephardic Jews of Spain and the Middle East, but these differences were not
significant. See Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews"
Even though Christianity
demonizes the Pharisees for its rejection of the replacement of the eternal
covenant, Christianity is also *dependent* on a concept that was taught by the
Pharisees. Belief in the eventual resurrection of the dead is a fundamental
belief of traditional Judaism. It was a belief that distinguished the Pharisees
from the Sadducees.
There is no mention
of the Pharisees in the Tanakh and the reason being that the sect of the
Pharisees, or separatists, did not yet exist. They originated in the third
century BCE long after the last of the texts of Tanakh appeared. They were
trying to keep the Torah "separate" from outside influence being
imposed upon it by the Greek and later Roman conquerors who wanted the Jews to
add their Emperor mangods and other deities into Jewish belief, after all,
that‘s what other nations conquered by the Greeks and Romans did! Religion and
rule were inseparable.
Modern day Pharisees
continue to be a thorn in the side of those who want us to assimilate out of
existence by abandoning our eternal covenant to take upon ourselves, beliefs
and forms of worship forbidden by God's commandments in the Torah for the
Jewish people.
I am proud to be of
the legacy of the real Pharisees.
Am Yisrael Chai!
Excellent description!
ReplyDeleteAm Yisrael Chai!
Hatikvah